Measurement can be a useful tool. But, when it comes to measuring outcomes in education there is always a risk that the measurement becomes the focus instead of the learning. When that happens, learning always seems to take a back seat to the measuring and testing that comes with it.
What are we teaching students by focusing so much on measuring, outcomes, rubrics, and so on? I once asked a group of students whether they thought that once they got a job they would be presented with a rubric and graded like they were in class. One student, without a trace of humor replied that yes that was exactly what she expected.
Consider this from a recent article on LinkedIn titled Beyond the Lemonade Stand: How to Teach High School Students Lean Startups: "Because these were high school kids with, for the first time, a real business relying on them, this portion of the class shook them so badly they couldn't move from their seats–literally. All their hard-wired school habits turned to dust as the kids realized their school tools were useless: there were no solution keys, no rubrics, no answers in the back of the book."
What are students going to do when there are no solutions keys, rubrics, or answers to check in the back of the book? Are we teaching them to over rely on tools for measuring so that the tools become crutches? Or should we be training businesses to use rubrics to evaluate their employees?
Yes, measuring is a useful tool. But, tools serve to further our goals. They should not be the goals themselves.
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."