Kevin J. Browne: Philosopher | Educator | Composer
  • home
  • Educator
  • Composer
  • Podcast
  • Blog
  • bio

PHILOSOPHICAL INSIGHTS

why is everyone focused on differences?

2/23/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay
​
​When I teach ethics one of the questions we discuss is: Does everyone have different morals?  Nearly every student answers yes.  I find this an odd and inaccurate answer.  But, even when presented with evidence for the sameness of our moral principles they remain unconvinced and continue to focus on the differences to the exclusion of any focus on our common moral foundation. Inasmuch as this has some pretty important implications for our moral discourse I'd like to posit some possible explanations for this focus on differences.

1.  We confuse surface disagreements for deeper disagreements.  It's easy to see disagreements when we discuss such issues as gun control, abortion, euthanasia, drug legalization.  Could those who disagree about these issues really share common moral principles?  I think to have the conversation at all, they have to.  Take the abortion debate.  Both sides care deeply about the issue but are not as clear as their common moral agreement.  But, it is there.  Both pro-life and pro-choice advocates believe in the moral principle: babies should not be killed for no good reason.  I would go so far as to say that everyone agrees with this moral principle.  The debate over abortion is not over a fundamental moral principle but rather some important factual questions such as whether the fetus should be classified as a baby.  While this may be an oversimplification of the issue I think it remains the case that both sides share much in common when it comes to their fundamental moral principles.

2.  We assume that having common moral principles would eliminate all debate.  The claim is often made that if we all had the same morals, there would be no debate about such issues as abortion, euthanasia, etc.  But, is this true?  It is put forward as if it were true but rarely is any evidence provided for this claim.  I think it turns out to be false.  To illustrate consider an analogy to a simpler example; food.  It is a universal human requirement that we need food to survive.  But, even though this is a universal agreement, there is a huge variance in what counts as food from one culture to the next.  There are even debates about what should and should not be eaten.  What explains these differences?  The environment is an important factor as well as cultural traditions.  But, the point remains that even with a fundamental agreement there are still debates.  The same holds true when it comes to morality.  As the philosopher James Rachels pointed out, there are several important fundamental moral principles we all share concerning the care of the young, indiscriminate killing, and truth-telling.  But, while we all share these fundamental principles we still debate over such things as what counts as proper care for the young, who can and who cannot be killed, and when it is permissible to lie.  

3.  We don't want to dig deeper to see common underlying moral principles.  In other words, we are intellectually lazy.  It takes work and deep thinking to see the common moral principles which lie beneath the surface disagreements.   It also takes a willingness to enter into a thoughtful dialogue.  The only way we can really discover the common values we share is to slow down, ask questions, and listen to the answers we get.  Ultimately this is a more valuable activity than trading insults and slogans.  

One activity I encourage my students to engage in comes from a TED talk given by Elizabeth Lesser titled Take the Other to Lunch.  In this activity, you sit down with someone who shares a different view regarding some important issue and have a thoughtful conversation.  As part of this conversation you ask them to share some of their life experiences and ask them the following questions:

What issues deeply concern you?
What have you always wanted to ask someone from the "other side?" 

The idea is not to persuade but to understand.  Perhaps if more people tried this they would see the common morality hidden underneath the surface arguments.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    KEVIN J. BROWNE

    Philosopher / Educator

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    These blog posts contain links to products on Amazon.com.  As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Categories

    All
    Beliefs
    Book Review
    Connections
    Critical Thinking
    Education
    Ethics
    Homeschooling
    Influence
    Learning
    Lifestyle
    Logic
    Motivation
    Philosophy
    Psychology
    Quora Question
    Quotations
    Reading
    Relevance
    Teaching
    Thinking

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture


    Picture
    Buy my sheet music at MusicaNeo
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Kevin Browne's book recommendations, liked quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists (read shelf)

    2022 Reading Challenge

    2022 Reading Challenge
    Kevin has read 12 books toward his goal of 63 books.
    hide
    12 of 63 (19%)
    view books
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • home
  • Educator
  • Composer
  • Podcast
  • Blog
  • bio